<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking a Pass on Flex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/</link>
	<description>by Chris Mallinson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mallinson.ca/?p=59#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Totally agree about the iPhone FlashPlayer.  That will go a long way to making Flex accepted.

Flex apps have their place, no doubt, and the mobile market, in my opinion is one where Flex will flourish, but I don&#039;t think the demand for HTML based sites will be reduced any time soon.

The good thing about all this is that both platforms can use the same back-end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree about the iPhone FlashPlayer.  That will go a long way to making Flex accepted.</p>
<p>Flex apps have their place, no doubt, and the mobile market, in my opinion is one where Flex will flourish, but I don&#8217;t think the demand for HTML based sites will be reduced any time soon.</p>
<p>The good thing about all this is that both platforms can use the same back-end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Kukiel</title>
		<link>http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Kukiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mallinson.ca/?p=59#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of all Flash &quot;websites&quot; myself but they have there place.  As a business app front end we have had nothing but success.  There is the initial load but after that everything is really fast and the swf&#039;s cache well.

Flex UI&#039;s as application provide features we just cant get a hold of with pure html not to mention the ability to shift it to AIR and run it on the desktop.

All I can say is we are looking to the future and we see Flex as that and when ( if ) they release FlashPlayer to the iPhone it will be even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of all Flash &#8220;websites&#8221; myself but they have there place.  As a business app front end we have had nothing but success.  There is the initial load but after that everything is really fast and the swf&#8217;s cache well.</p>
<p>Flex UI&#8217;s as application provide features we just cant get a hold of with pure html not to mention the ability to shift it to AIR and run it on the desktop.</p>
<p>All I can say is we are looking to the future and we see Flex as that and when ( if ) they release FlashPlayer to the iPhone it will be even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Brownlee</title>
		<link>http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Brownlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mallinson.ca/?p=59#comment-19</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not that hard to understand, and, in fact, you stated most of the reasons in your post.  From my experience, it&#039;s the companies that are switching to Flex, not the individual developers, because of those very reasons.

We moved to 100% Flex UIs here about 5 months ago and we&#039;re not looking back.  True, HTML and Javascript can still make an attractive interface, but when doing large, corporate applications, the productivity that Flex provides for us is just too great.

As for the whole &quot;you&#039;re missing the boat&quot; concept, I&#039;ll agree on that.  Flex is a tool you&#039;ll need to have in your back pocket in the years to come.  Too many companies are moving to it for developers (especially ones that are savvy in the Adobe stack of technologies) to not spend time learning it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not that hard to understand, and, in fact, you stated most of the reasons in your post.  From my experience, it&#8217;s the companies that are switching to Flex, not the individual developers, because of those very reasons.</p>
<p>We moved to 100% Flex UIs here about 5 months ago and we&#8217;re not looking back.  True, HTML and Javascript can still make an attractive interface, but when doing large, corporate applications, the productivity that Flex provides for us is just too great.</p>
<p>As for the whole &#8220;you&#8217;re missing the boat&#8221; concept, I&#8217;ll agree on that.  Flex is a tool you&#8217;ll need to have in your back pocket in the years to come.  Too many companies are moving to it for developers (especially ones that are savvy in the Adobe stack of technologies) to not spend time learning it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://mallinson.ca/post/passingon-flex/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mallinson.ca/?p=59#comment-18</guid>
		<description>No, you&#039;re not alone. I have yet to see a Flex application that made sense to me. I just don&#039;t see what all the hype is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you&#8217;re not alone. I have yet to see a Flex application that made sense to me. I just don&#8217;t see what all the hype is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 294/295 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: assets.mallinson.ca

Served from: mallinson.ca @ 2012-05-18 16:38:42 -->
